Dental Journals
MAR Dental Sciences & Oral Rehabilitation (2023)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86938/869389f3e582dd5b950d0cf8295910cbf5f3fe2c" alt="MAR1"
Minimal Invasive Approaches to Maxillary Atrophy
The rehabilitation of an atrophied maxilla presents a complex, multi-faceted challenge for the dental professional1- 3. A variety of strategies have been developed over the years, each with its unique set of benefits and drawbacks. The more invasive techniques, while often effective, involve a greater level of surgical trauma, higher cost, longer recovery times, and a higher risk of complications 4- 7. On the other hand, minimal invasive approaches offer several advantages, including shorter healing periods and less surgical morbidity, albeit with their own set of challenges 8 -11. Among these, the use of pterygoid implants and the transnasal approach, when applied with specific implants, may allow for early loading, providing patients with a functional, aesthetic, and stable oral rehabilitation within 2-3 weeks 5,10. This paper present two cases that illustrate the application and effectiveness of these minimally invasive strategies
Journal of Oral Medicine and Dental Research
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/036be/036bec52af2e786ec598512d9be2833e117e4683" alt="Journal of Oral Med1"
Treatment Modalities for Overdentures on Screw-Retained Bars on Implants
Full-arch rehabilitation for the maxilla and mandible using fixed implant-supported prostheses offers superior function, prosthetic stability, and enhanced quality of life. However, these treatments are often cost-prohibitive, making them inaccessible for many patients [1,2].
Implant overdentures present a more affordable alternative, providing improved function and stability with the use of two or more implants for retention. Unlike fixed full-arch restorations, implant overdentures are relying primarily on soft-tissue for support and can be removed by the patient for
routine hygiene purposes [3-5].
Juniper Publishers
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f8af/2f8af56e862df95c888bc06074775d75e1097102" alt="Juniper Publishers1"
Minimal Invasive Modality for Full Rehabilitation of Edentulous Mandible with One-Piece Implants in Elderly Patients
The use of conventional implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous space has been discussed extensively in the literature [1-4]. However, conventional implant systems may be limited or inapplicable in restoring some edentulous spaces due to various anatomical reasons. One of such reason is insufficient space between adjacent edentulous teeth for the use of a conventional implant which makes implant placement impossible [4,5-7]. In these situations, an alternative implant system for the restoration of such cases is required. The One-Piece implants help in restoring edentulous spaces that previously cannot be restored with conventional implants; it also encourages the use of minimally invasive surgical techniques which encourage maximum tissue preservation [8,9]
BIO MEDICAL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3c11/e3c1131ca22b20cb529da4377dca489984ec6e59" alt="BIO Medical1"
Retreatment of a Failed Quad Zygoma Implant Procedure with Cortically Fixed at once Hybrid Plates: Case Report
Restoration of a severely edentulous arch poses an enormous
challenge to the dentist more so in the maxillary region where
various anatomical structures reduce the option for extensive
surgery. Bone augmentation may be required to enable placement of a sufficient number and length of implants to support an implant prosthesis [1,2]. Retreatment of failed implant further complicates the existing problem because of further loss of bone height associated with loss implant and the presence of scar tissue in the previous operated and implant site which make reoperation difficult. Zygomatic Implants have been used to provide support for oral rehabilitation where there has been a substantial amount of
bone loss from the upper jaw due to resorption or implant failure [3,4].
Irish Dental Magazine
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/798b8/798b8fcca99febba6c516a6ca03afb2837a28e58" alt="Irish Dental1"
Minimally invasive treatment options in the atrophied bone
The rehabilitation of an atrophied maxilla presents a complex, multi-faceted challenge for the dental professional1- 3. A variety of strategies have been developed over the years, each with its unique set of benefits and drawbacks. The more invasive techniques, while often effective, involve a greater level of surgical trauma, higher cost, longer recovery times, and a higher risk of complications 4- 7. On the other hand, minimal invasive approaches offer several advantages, including shorter healing periods and less surgical morbidity, albeit with their own set of challenges 8 -11. Among these, the use of pterygoid implants and the transnasal approach, when applied with specific implants, may allow for early loading, providing patients with a functional, aesthetic, and stable oral rehabilitation within 2-3 weeks 5,10. This paper present two cases that illustrate the application and effectiveness of these minimally invasive strategies
RESEARCH GATE
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc7a2/dc7a222332114e3451c3325c32ca8620a008d02b" alt="Research Gate1"
A Novel Technique for the Treatment of Severely Atrophied Maxilla with Immediate Dental Implant Loading
International Journal of Case Reports & Short Reviews
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b533f/b533f4a474700eeb8d3f4273f30e4f698083e8d4" alt="International journal2"
Minimal Invasive Concept for the Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaw with One-piece Implants
The use of conventional implants in the rehabilitation of
edentulous space has been discussed extensively in the literature [1-4]. However, conventional implant systems may be limited or inapplicable in restoring some edentulous spaces due to various anatomical reasons. One of such reason is insuffi cient space between adjacent edentulous teeth for the use of a conventional implant e.g. regular Platform implants (3.5 – 4.5 mm diameter) or Wide Diameter implants (usually > 4.5 mm in diameter) which makes implant placement impossible [5-7,8,4]. In these situations, an alternative implant system for the restoration of such cases is required.